Europe chose to resolve the
financial crisis in 2008 with a programme of austerity for the peripheral and
weakest economies while the US and UK chose to recharge their economies with
quantitative easing. Both also increased
controls over the banks and brought interest rates down to an historically low
level.
So how has the different
approaches affected the current economic performances of the countries
involved?
In Europe the result has been to improve
the performance of the peripheral economies and to regain investor confidence
in the robustness of the European monetary system. This approach has been successful but has
resulted in lower anticipated growth in the next couple of years from the two
main northern countries with German and French GDP growth forecast by the IMF
to be 1.7% and 1.0% respectively in 2014 with 1.6% and 1.5% forecast for
2015. Italian GDP on the other hand is
forecast as 0.6% in 2014 and 1.1% in 2015 following the austerity measures
forced upon it in order for it to qualify for financial support.
In the UK comparable figures from
the IMF are for GDP growth of 2.9% and 2.5% for 2014 and 2015
respectively. In the US they are
forecasting 2.7% and 3.0%.
In Japan forecasts for GDP growth
in 2014 and 2015 are for 1.3% and 1.0%.
Japan went through a similar financial
crisis in the early nineties and has suffered stagnation since then with
falling prices and increasing government borrowing. They have responded recently under Mr Abe
with a quantitative easing programme of their own which, coupled with an
austerity programme of fiscal reform and talk of fundamental reform was to
develop their own recovery from this period of stagnation. It is early days to judge the result but some
growth is forecast in GDP which is a positive sign and a determination to
extricate themselves is clear. Although
the fundamental reforms are proving hard to achieve, inflation is forecast to
be 2.8% this year as it has been given a boost by the introduction of a sales
tax last month of 15%. An inflation
figure of 1.3% forecast for 2015 is progress.
The fear is that, in the absence
of a monetary stimulus programme on the lines of that followed in the US,
Europe will go down the same route as that followed by Japan in the nineties
and experience low growth and deflation.
The forecast for inflation in 2014 is 0.8% followed by 1.2% in 2015
which, if achieved, will avoid deflation, but is regarded by many independent
economists as too optimistic. Talk of a stimulus programme by Mario Draghi to
combat this risk is thought to be his attempt to talk down the currency (a high
currency leads to lower import prices and lower inflation) without actually
introducing the stimulus. The Germans
remain very opposed to any such action as it is regarded as a way to avoid the
reforms needed in the Southern economies and, perhaps, France and that it could
lead to unacceptably high inflation in the future.
The UK and US have followed very
similar paths from an early date with major programmes of quantitative easing,
low interest rates and a programme of cutting government expenditure. The result has been faster economic growth
but without any adverse reaction detectable in the inflation figures which are forecast
to be 1.9% in 2014 and 2015 in the UK and 1.4% and 1.6% in the US.
The result of these responses to
the financial crisis can be seen in recent statistics with demand for housing
and retail products rising sharply in the UK and US while consumer confidence
in Europe remains low.
In the UK house prices rose 8.9%
on average across the country according to Rightmove. Inflation was marginally higher than
anticipated at 1.8% aided by the strength of Sterling over the last year which
was up nearly 10%. This strength has dampened hopes for strong UK export growth
as seen in the latest figures which revealed a fall of 1.0% over the last
quarter. On the other hand imports fell
by 1.1% with the dampening effect of higher Sterling on import prices
contributing to the slowdown. An increase in consumer confidence is reflected
in higher house prices as is the strong retail sales figures which rose 6.9% on
the year aided by improving weather and wages which rose in line with
inflation. The Bank of England revealed the minutes of the MPC which reflected
unanimity for retaining low interest rates.
The Governor reiterated their determination to retain interest rates at
a low level until well into next year and to tackle any threat from rapidly
rising house prices by using ‘other tools’ such as a reduction in the ‘Help to
buy’ programme and tighter criteria for lending. The CBI’s survey on industrial
trends revealed a disappointingly flat trend, however, the UK seems to be
growing faster than forecast, as GDP came in at 3.1% aided by a continued
strong performance from the services sector up 0.9% in the March quarter and a
recovering trend for capital investment which was up 8.7% over the year.
Government borrowing came in lower for the year ended April 2014 and in line
with plans.
There was a similar story from
the US where the minutes of the FOMC meeting were published and followed by
speeches from various Federal Reserve officials including Janet Yellen who
reiterated their continued dedication to low interest rates and to ‘tapering’
the rate at which they pump money into the US economy. Their fear is that the recovery in the
housing market will stall should interest rates rise as a result of them
‘tapering’. Existing home sales,
however, remained at healthy levels with a rise of 1.3% in April over the
previous month and new home sales rose 6.4% over the same period.
In Europe manufacturing in
Germany maintained some growth with a figure of 52.9 (above 50 is growth) but
this was lower than the previous month’s 54.9. In France, on the other hand,
they continue to be in the doldrums with a figure of 49.2 after a higher figure
in the previous month of 51.2. European
consumer confidence remains low with a fall of 7.2 in May but was a slight
improvement on the fall of 8.6 in April.
In Italy industrial orders returned to growth with an increase of 2.8%
over the last year.
Short term the Anglo Saxon
countries are performing best but without much more success improving the
fiscal balances as a percentage of GDP the long term result may be totally
different.
Darren Winters
0 comments:
Post a Comment